Why Does Each Delhi vs Lt Governor Dispute Come To Us: Supreme Court docket

[ad_1]

Why Does Every Delhi vs Lt Governor Dispute Come To Us: Supreme Court

The DCPCR had approached the Supreme Court docket over alleged freezing of its funds.

New Delhi:

Why ought to “each dispute” between the Delhi authorities and the Lieutenant Governor land within the Supreme Court docket, the highest courtroom noticed on Friday and requested the Delhi Fee for Safety of Little one Rights (DCPCR) to method the excessive courtroom with its grievance.

The DCPCR had approached the Supreme Court docket over alleged freezing of its funds.

“What is occurring is, each dispute, one and all, between the Authorities of the NCT of Delhi and the Lieutenant Governor is coming right here as a (Article) 226 petition,” a bench headed by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud mentioned.

Article 226 of the Structure offers with energy of the excessive courts to subject sure writs.

The bench, additionally comprising Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, noticed on Thursday, it handled a plea by Delhi authorities difficult Lt Governor V Ok Saxena’s resolution to terminate the providers of all civil defence volunteers working as marshals in DTC buses.

“Go to the Delhi Excessive Court docket. Why ought to we entertain a petition underneath (Article) 32 right here,” the bench instructed senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, showing for the DCPCR.

Mr Sankaranarayanan mentioned the plea filed by the fee was a bit completely different from different disputes between the Delhi authorities and the Lt Governor which have landed earlier than the Supreme Court docket to date. “This can be a fee and the fee’s cash has been frozen,” he mentioned.

The CJI instructed him that the Supreme Court docket has entertained pleas coping with broader constitutional points. “Now go to the excessive courtroom,” Justice Chandrachud mentioned.

Mr Sankaranarayanan, whereas placing forth his argument, mentioned the funds of the fee can’t be frozen. “How can six million kids of the state be instructed that not a penny goes to return to the fee,” he mentioned.

“That’s the reason excessive courts are there,” the bench instructed him and requested, “Why are you bucking the Delhi Excessive Court docket?” “All the pieces between the Delhi authorities and the Lieutenant Governor is coming right here each two days. Bus marshal scheme was discontinued and we acquired a petition underneath (Article) 32,” the CJI mentioned.

Mr Sankaranarayanan mentioned the DCPCR is an unbiased fee and the tenure of its members have come to an finish. He mentioned at current, the fee was not able to method the excessive courtroom afresh.

“Contemplating the character of the grievance which is being addressed earlier than this courtroom by the DCPCR, we’re of the thought of view {that a} petition underneath Article 226 can be the suitable treatment,” the bench noticed.

Referring to Mr Sankaranarayanan’s submission concerning the finish of the tenure of the members of the fee, the bench directed the Supreme Court docket registry to switch these proceedings to the Delhi Excessive Court docket.

Whereas disposing of the petition, it mentioned the plea shall be re-numbered as a petition underneath Article 226 of the Structure.

(Aside from the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV workers and is printed from a syndicated feed.)

[ad_2]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *